If you require urgent legal assistance/representation, you can use the Law Institute of Victoria’s lawyer referral service or contact Victoria Legal Aid. More information can be found here.
For all new enquiries use our consumer enquiry form:
If you are unable to use the web form you can also contact us via:
Email: consumerenquiry@lsbc.vic.gov.au
Phone: 03 9679 8001
Use our lawyer enquiry form:
Use our external examiner enquiry form:
External examiner enquiry form
Our office hours are from 9am to 5pm Monday to Friday.
We are closed on Victorian public holidays.
We encourage visitors to book an appointment first, as this helps to make sure the right person is available on the day. Call or email us to arrange an appointment.
Reception: 03 9679 8001
Local call cost: 1300 796 344
Street: Level 27, 500 Bourke Street Melbourne 3000
Post: GPO Box 492 Melbourne 3001
A free interpreting service is available to assist you with communicating with our office. To access this service, call the Translating and Interpreting Service on 131 450. Please note that our office is open from 9am to 5pm Monday to Friday excluding public holidays.
If you are deaf or have a hearing or speech impairment, you can phone us through the National Relay Service. Visit their website at http://relayservice.gov.au.
We have developed a communication book to help us communicate more effectively with members of the public and the legal profession who may have communication difficulties.
This communication book is available at our reception on Level 27, 500 Bourke Street, Melbourne, 3000.
If you’d like to use this tool to communicate, just point to the Communication Access Symbol displayed at reception and our staff will be able to assist you.
Offences under the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (Vic) and penalty units
This information sheet addresses the frequently asked questions relating to prohibited lay associates.
This fact sheet provides information about some of the non-legal services lawyers may provide and details of other agencies which may be able to assist you.
This fact sheet explains your rights and your lawyer’s obligations around legal costs
This fact sheet provides information about how to prepare for, and what to expect from your first meeting with a lawyer.
This fact sheet offers tips to help you to develop and maintain a positive and productive relationship with your lawyer.
This page lists the names of people disqualified under the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (Vic) and earlier equivalent Victorian legislation.
These persons are prohibited from working for a local legal practitioner or law practice in any capacity, without prior approval of the Victorian Legal Services Board.
They form part of a broader category known as ‘prohibited lay associates’. See further information on non-legal employees and our Fact sheet – Prohibited lay associates (see below).
A lawyer or law practice wishing to employ a prohibited lay associate must apply to the Board for approval to do so. Failure to obtain Board permission exposes the lawyer or law practice and the prohibited lay associate to prosecution.
The table below is not exhaustive and will be updated as new orders are made. Where available, the decisions or orders have been linked to the names of each individual.
(See Note on Disqualified Persons below)
The table lists the names of people disqualified by order of:
NAME | PERIOD OF DISQUALIFICATION | CITATION / DATE OF ORDER |
JUDD, Paul William | 21 September 2012 – no end date (Indefinite) | [2012] VCAT 1422 |
KYRIACKOU, Michael Antonio | 17 June 2013 – | [2013] VCAT 735 Order of 17 June 2013 |
LELLETON, John Leo | 24 May 2013 – no end date (Indefinite) | Order of 24 May 2013 |
SWIES, Dorian | 1 December 2015 – 1 December 2025 |
VLSB v Swies |
GODRIDGE, Lauren | 25 May 2017 – 25 May 2027 |
VLSB v Godridge |
Frith, Samantha | 14 March 2018 – 14 March 2028 |
VLSB v Frith |
Razos, Athena* *Please see our statement: VLSB v RAZOS for a list of aliases by which Ms Razos has otherwise been known by from time to time. |
18 November 2020 – no end date (Indefinite) | VLSB v RAZOS |
The disqualified persons listed in the table are only those non-lawyers who have been prohibited from working in a law practice or for a lawyer by VCAT or Court orders due to inappropriate conduct.
The law also disqualifies a broader range of people than those listed above in connection with legal services. All of these disqualified persons are also prohibited lay associates and include a person:
A further category of prohibited person, not listed in this table, is any person who has been found guilty of theft or a criminal dishonesty offence.
For details of disciplinary action taken against Australian legal practitioners and former lawyers see either the Register of Lawyers or the Register of Disciplinary Action (lawyers).
The RODA is a register which lists disciplinary action taken against Australian lawyers under the Legal Profession Uniform Law.
For information on action(s) taken against non-lawyers (disqualified persons), please see the Non-lawyer Disciplinary Action page.
You can search the Register of Lawyers to see disciplinary action taken against lawyers, either with or without a current practising certificate.
To find a full list of lawyers with disciplinary action on the register you can select 'Lawyers' as the search type, and click the box 'Only show individuals with disciplinary action' then hit 'Search'.
The RODA lists Victorian-registered lawyers who have been found guilty of a disciplinary offence or had their practising certificate suspended or cancelled. These decisions are usually made by either a Victorian court or the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal. The RODA also records decisions made by an equivalent court or tribunal from an interstate jurisdiction where the action is taken against a lawyer who is admitted or practising in Victoria.
The RODA also lists lawyers whose names have been struck off the Roll of Australian Lawyers maintained by the Supreme Court of Victoria.
The RODA includes disciplinary action from 1 April 1959 taken against a Victorian registered lawyer under the following legislation:
Disciplinary action taken under corresponding interstate laws will appear on the RODA only if the lawyer was admitted or practising in Victoria at the time of the conduct.
The RODA lists the following information:
If the finding in an entry is displayed as ‘other’, it indicates that we may not have information on that specific order. If it is an interstate disciplinary decision, you may contact the relevant jurisdiction to obtain further information. Links to the interstate registers are provided below.
There are some circumstances where a lawyer’s name will not be listed on the RODA after disciplinary action is taken against them. These include:
An entry usually remains on RODA for a period of 5 years. After this time the law requires the entry to be removed, unless the disciplinary sanction extends for a longer period than 5 years. This includes where a lawyer’s name was struck off.
The RODA will not display all instances where a court has appointed a receiver or the Board has appointed a manager to a law practice. These will only appear on the RODA if they arise from a finding of professional misconduct against a lawyer by a court or tribunal.
To find out if a lawyer holds a current Australian practising certificate, you can search our Register of Legal Practitioners & Law Practices.
Each interstate jurisdiction has a similar register. These can be accessed at the below links:
We are legally required to maintain the RODA to help protect consumers of legal services. While all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information on the RODA is correct at the time of publication, we are reliant on information provided by the courts, tribunals and interstate authorities. We cannot accept any liability for any loss or damage that may result from reliance on the RODA and any error, omission or defect in the information contained therein.
Any person whose name appears on the RODA may be eligible to apply to a court/tribunal for non-publication of the order, and may wish to seek independent legal advice on this matter.